<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Doctors Require Photo ID for Treatment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philosecurity.org/2009/05/28/doctors-require-photo-id-for-treatment/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philosecurity.org/2009/05/28/doctors-require-photo-id-for-treatment</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:41:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: j. pitzer</title>
		<link>http://philosecurity.org/2009/05/28/doctors-require-photo-id-for-treatment/comment-page-1#comment-5731</link>
		<dc:creator>j. pitzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 00:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosecurity.org/?p=1779#comment-5731</guid>
		<description>I think this is all ridiculous. Before you know it we will have to show I.d. To buy groceries, gas or any other basis necessities. Also what about the homeless who can&#039;t even afford a place to lay their head.  Do you really think they can afford to go to the bmv to get an I&#039;d made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is all ridiculous. Before you know it we will have to show I.d. To buy groceries, gas or any other basis necessities. Also what about the homeless who can&#8217;t even afford a place to lay their head.  Do you really think they can afford to go to the bmv to get an I&#8217;d made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephan</title>
		<link>http://philosecurity.org/2009/05/28/doctors-require-photo-id-for-treatment/comment-page-1#comment-5548</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosecurity.org/?p=1779#comment-5548</guid>
		<description>This is all to put our medical information into the MIB (no not the movie with Will Smith), Medical Information Bureau. This is basically a &quot;credit report&quot; of your medical history. Insurance companies and the like use it to verify your application for services to determine if your a risk. Now with the Red Flag act, its just one more nail in the coffin so to say. Now they will have your picture, drivers license data and they can track you where ever you go. I went to a new doctor today and they wanted picture id, I refused my drivers license but offered a copy of my passport. They refused service. I&#039;m contacting the medical board, attorney general and the FTC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all to put our medical information into the MIB (no not the movie with Will Smith), Medical Information Bureau. This is basically a &#8220;credit report&#8221; of your medical history. Insurance companies and the like use it to verify your application for services to determine if your a risk. Now with the Red Flag act, its just one more nail in the coffin so to say. Now they will have your picture, drivers license data and they can track you where ever you go. I went to a new doctor today and they wanted picture id, I refused my drivers license but offered a copy of my passport. They refused service. I&#8217;m contacting the medical board, attorney general and the FTC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cathy</title>
		<link>http://philosecurity.org/2009/05/28/doctors-require-photo-id-for-treatment/comment-page-1#comment-5496</link>
		<dc:creator>cathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosecurity.org/?p=1779#comment-5496</guid>
		<description>I have worked at physician over 22 years. I really like working in this field.  At first I was thinking that all honest patients would not mind showing proper id, only people with something to hide would mind.  I get all the returned mail for bad address, no such person, reports that someone stole their wallet 2 months ago and now the real person is getting explanation of benefits from their insurance saying they had an operation with us for 15K and insurance won&#039;t pay.  Do you just do surgery on patients without knowing who they are??  Guess what, this definitely happens. When I worked in georgetown students would go out to party and drink and get their wallet stolen.  Never report it to the insurance carrier and bills and bills are racked up under their name with their insurance.  Those diagnosis never leave your &quot;insurance file&quot; and all the insurance carriers &quot;share&quot; the information.   I am the who gets letters from insurance carriers asking me to prove that we have the patient&#039;s signature on file, photo id of the member on the insurance card, and documentation that the person who presented the insurance card had the right to do so.  The only way I can was to present copy of patient registration form with a copy of photo id where the signatures should match what they have on file.  If I am not allowed to have that, how can I get the claims paid??  Patients want services NOW, Surgery NOW before my insurance terminates or my new deductible kicks in.... but the doctors offices are left months later trying to get the claims paid by your insurance carriers who have a lot of rules (so they don&#039;t have to pay the doctors and hospitals).  All the practices I have worked at have good security for the computer data, but for paper files and for the papers before they get scanned they is no real security, they sent in a bin/box until the &quot;girl&quot; at the desk gets to it.  Then they go in a large bin for shredding by a shredding company.  Alot of dr&#039;s offices have a cash stealing problem so they don&#039;t like to accept cash payments.  If you cant trust the staff with your cash how can you with your ID.. Many drs&#039; offices have high turnover and they don&#039;t like to change the locks or the systems in the office, they also don&#039;t usually prosecute people caught stealing in their office, so theft can be a problem at physicians offices and hospitals by staff.  So having read  all these entries, now I have a big change of heart on this matter.  I think in the future, I will just request to look at the photo id, jot down a notation that I viewed the id and it was found to appear true and the data matched the insurance card information etc..  I would not ask to scan it.  If the insurance wont pay a patients claim because they can&#039;t verify it is the right patient we will just bill the patient for the full thing and then the real patient can deal with it later or the doctor will write it off.  I can definitely see the points on the other side of the desk after reading all these interesting points. Thank you for the wake up call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have worked at physician over 22 years. I really like working in this field.  At first I was thinking that all honest patients would not mind showing proper id, only people with something to hide would mind.  I get all the returned mail for bad address, no such person, reports that someone stole their wallet 2 months ago and now the real person is getting explanation of benefits from their insurance saying they had an operation with us for 15K and insurance won&#8217;t pay.  Do you just do surgery on patients without knowing who they are??  Guess what, this definitely happens. When I worked in georgetown students would go out to party and drink and get their wallet stolen.  Never report it to the insurance carrier and bills and bills are racked up under their name with their insurance.  Those diagnosis never leave your &#8220;insurance file&#8221; and all the insurance carriers &#8220;share&#8221; the information.   I am the who gets letters from insurance carriers asking me to prove that we have the patient&#8217;s signature on file, photo id of the member on the insurance card, and documentation that the person who presented the insurance card had the right to do so.  The only way I can was to present copy of patient registration form with a copy of photo id where the signatures should match what they have on file.  If I am not allowed to have that, how can I get the claims paid??  Patients want services NOW, Surgery NOW before my insurance terminates or my new deductible kicks in&#8230;. but the doctors offices are left months later trying to get the claims paid by your insurance carriers who have a lot of rules (so they don&#8217;t have to pay the doctors and hospitals).  All the practices I have worked at have good security for the computer data, but for paper files and for the papers before they get scanned they is no real security, they sent in a bin/box until the &#8220;girl&#8221; at the desk gets to it.  Then they go in a large bin for shredding by a shredding company.  Alot of dr&#8217;s offices have a cash stealing problem so they don&#8217;t like to accept cash payments.  If you cant trust the staff with your cash how can you with your ID.. Many drs&#8217; offices have high turnover and they don&#8217;t like to change the locks or the systems in the office, they also don&#8217;t usually prosecute people caught stealing in their office, so theft can be a problem at physicians offices and hospitals by staff.  So having read  all these entries, now I have a big change of heart on this matter.  I think in the future, I will just request to look at the photo id, jot down a notation that I viewed the id and it was found to appear true and the data matched the insurance card information etc..  I would not ask to scan it.  If the insurance wont pay a patients claim because they can&#8217;t verify it is the right patient we will just bill the patient for the full thing and then the real patient can deal with it later or the doctor will write it off.  I can definitely see the points on the other side of the desk after reading all these interesting points. Thank you for the wake up call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://philosecurity.org/2009/05/28/doctors-require-photo-id-for-treatment/comment-page-1#comment-5476</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosecurity.org/?p=1779#comment-5476</guid>
		<description>I went to Target to buy a 6 pack the other day.  They asked for ID.  I held out my wallet.  The clerk said that I needed to take the ID out because she had to scan it.  I said &quot;Whoa!&quot;  She said she was required to scan the ID.  I refused to buy the beer (I&#039;m waaaayyyyy beyond  21).  GROSS invasion of privacy.  Ditto at the Doctor&#039;s office.    Now, if its only Target or one doctor that wants to scan ID I can go to Wal Mart or another doctor, etc.  But what if they ALL want to scan ID?  I&#039;m shut out from having a beer.  Or getting medical services.  Or (as the Feds have threatened if the states don&#039;t adopt &quot;Real ID&quot;) even going to the post office!  Where does it end?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to Target to buy a 6 pack the other day.  They asked for ID.  I held out my wallet.  The clerk said that I needed to take the ID out because she had to scan it.  I said &#8220;Whoa!&#8221;  She said she was required to scan the ID.  I refused to buy the beer (I&#8217;m waaaayyyyy beyond  21).  GROSS invasion of privacy.  Ditto at the Doctor&#8217;s office.    Now, if its only Target or one doctor that wants to scan ID I can go to Wal Mart or another doctor, etc.  But what if they ALL want to scan ID?  I&#8217;m shut out from having a beer.  Or getting medical services.  Or (as the Feds have threatened if the states don&#8217;t adopt &#8220;Real ID&#8221;) even going to the post office!  Where does it end?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: travelingrd</title>
		<link>http://philosecurity.org/2009/05/28/doctors-require-photo-id-for-treatment/comment-page-1#comment-5443</link>
		<dc:creator>travelingrd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosecurity.org/?p=1779#comment-5443</guid>
		<description>The hospital network my physician is in likes hand scans now.  They said it was optional to have my hand scanned into the system.  I opted no.  No one gets biometrics from me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hospital network my physician is in likes hand scans now.  They said it was optional to have my hand scanned into the system.  I opted no.  No one gets biometrics from me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WANDA</title>
		<link>http://philosecurity.org/2009/05/28/doctors-require-photo-id-for-treatment/comment-page-1#comment-5404</link>
		<dc:creator>WANDA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosecurity.org/?p=1779#comment-5404</guid>
		<description>Love this! So informative. Thanks!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love this! So informative. Thanks!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamV</title>
		<link>http://philosecurity.org/2009/05/28/doctors-require-photo-id-for-treatment/comment-page-1#comment-5308</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosecurity.org/?p=1779#comment-5308</guid>
		<description>Fight fire with fire - insist on seeing the ID of everyone at the doctor&#039;s office who deals with you.
How do you know that the receptionist / nurse / administrator who is looking at your file on screen or on paper is really who they say and not some weird serial killer who may change your records so you get given the wrong drugs?

Ask your doctor for some photo ID and a certified copy of his/her practising certficate or medical board membership (or whatever is appropriate to your jurisidcition, in the UK this would be membership of the GMC). 

Surprise them further by getting your laptop and portable scanner out of your backpack - just to make a copy &quot;for your records&quot;.

How about producing some joke ID, such as membership of the KKK (photo taken with hood on, of course) or the National Hairdressers Association (picture of top of head), or International Clown Institute (in full makeup and wig). 
Maybe you&#039;re a member of the Porn Actor&#039;s Guild, with appropriate photo to match. Offer to prove it really is you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fight fire with fire &#8211; insist on seeing the ID of everyone at the doctor&#8217;s office who deals with you.<br />
How do you know that the receptionist / nurse / administrator who is looking at your file on screen or on paper is really who they say and not some weird serial killer who may change your records so you get given the wrong drugs?</p>
<p>Ask your doctor for some photo ID and a certified copy of his/her practising certficate or medical board membership (or whatever is appropriate to your jurisidcition, in the UK this would be membership of the GMC). </p>
<p>Surprise them further by getting your laptop and portable scanner out of your backpack &#8211; just to make a copy &#8220;for your records&#8221;.</p>
<p>How about producing some joke ID, such as membership of the KKK (photo taken with hood on, of course) or the National Hairdressers Association (picture of top of head), or International Clown Institute (in full makeup and wig).<br />
Maybe you&#8217;re a member of the Porn Actor&#8217;s Guild, with appropriate photo to match. Offer to prove it really is you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: janeley</title>
		<link>http://philosecurity.org/2009/05/28/doctors-require-photo-id-for-treatment/comment-page-1#comment-5219</link>
		<dc:creator>janeley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosecurity.org/?p=1779#comment-5219</guid>
		<description>Has anyone ever had their picture taken at the doctor&#039;s office?  I had that happen to me today.  They said it&#039;s to protect my identity.   I thought it was kind of weird, but since they know everything else about me and it&#039;s a digital camera picture I thought it was okay.  Now I&#039;m having second thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone ever had their picture taken at the doctor&#8217;s office?  I had that happen to me today.  They said it&#8217;s to protect my identity.   I thought it was kind of weird, but since they know everything else about me and it&#8217;s a digital camera picture I thought it was okay.  Now I&#8217;m having second thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tesfai</title>
		<link>http://philosecurity.org/2009/05/28/doctors-require-photo-id-for-treatment/comment-page-1#comment-5196</link>
		<dc:creator>Tesfai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosecurity.org/?p=1779#comment-5196</guid>
		<description>My driving licence doesn&#039;t even have my photo on it.  In this state, at age 60, you can renew the licence by mail, and in the place where the picture normally goes, is written &quot;valid without photo&quot;.  I have never (yet) been denied treatment.

This whole thing makes about as much sense as carding senior citizens before selling them beer or cigarettes.  They have started doing that, too.  I am 67, and have been carded at  the store for beer more times in the past 5 years than I ever was when I was young enough to be mistaken for someone under age.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My driving licence doesn&#8217;t even have my photo on it.  In this state, at age 60, you can renew the licence by mail, and in the place where the picture normally goes, is written &#8220;valid without photo&#8221;.  I have never (yet) been denied treatment.</p>
<p>This whole thing makes about as much sense as carding senior citizens before selling them beer or cigarettes.  They have started doing that, too.  I am 67, and have been carded at  the store for beer more times in the past 5 years than I ever was when I was young enough to be mistaken for someone under age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Sturdy</title>
		<link>http://philosecurity.org/2009/05/28/doctors-require-photo-id-for-treatment/comment-page-1#comment-5108</link>
		<dc:creator>John Sturdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosecurity.org/?p=1779#comment-5108</guid>
		<description>I hope you require a copy of the doctor&#039;s ID before you let them treat you.  After all, you need to know it&#039;s a real doctor treating you, and not some random person who has stolen the doctor&#039;s identity, and could prescribe inappropriate treatment.

;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you require a copy of the doctor&#8217;s ID before you let them treat you.  After all, you need to know it&#8217;s a real doctor treating you, and not some random person who has stolen the doctor&#8217;s identity, and could prescribe inappropriate treatment.</p>
<p> <img src='http://philosecurity.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Knowlton</title>
		<link>http://philosecurity.org/2009/05/28/doctors-require-photo-id-for-treatment/comment-page-1#comment-5097</link>
		<dc:creator>C Knowlton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosecurity.org/?p=1779#comment-5097</guid>
		<description>Here is my take on this.  The government is in the process of digitalizing your medical records.  Seeing your picture ID and &quot;having to scan it&quot; is two different things.  The BS behind preventing fraud is exactly that.  If they were &quot;preventing fraud&quot; seeing my ID should suffice.  Scanning a copy of my picture ID or taking a picture of me in the doctor&#039;s office is my right, not law.  I will not allow a photo to be placed in my medical file so they can &quot;match me up.&quot;  If they won&#039;t see me then I&#039;ll go someplace else.  I have argued this numerous times.  It is not a law per say but you are told that at the doctor&#039;s office for 1) they really don&#039;t know why or 2) are told its law for the sake of arguement.  DO NOT LET THEM PUT A PICTURE IN YOUR FILE...I have still been seen and there still isn&#039;t a picture in any of my files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is my take on this.  The government is in the process of digitalizing your medical records.  Seeing your picture ID and &#8220;having to scan it&#8221; is two different things.  The BS behind preventing fraud is exactly that.  If they were &#8220;preventing fraud&#8221; seeing my ID should suffice.  Scanning a copy of my picture ID or taking a picture of me in the doctor&#8217;s office is my right, not law.  I will not allow a photo to be placed in my medical file so they can &#8220;match me up.&#8221;  If they won&#8217;t see me then I&#8217;ll go someplace else.  I have argued this numerous times.  It is not a law per say but you are told that at the doctor&#8217;s office for 1) they really don&#8217;t know why or 2) are told its law for the sake of arguement.  DO NOT LET THEM PUT A PICTURE IN YOUR FILE&#8230;I have still been seen and there still isn&#8217;t a picture in any of my files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam Rathmell</title>
		<link>http://philosecurity.org/2009/05/28/doctors-require-photo-id-for-treatment/comment-page-1#comment-4984</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam Rathmell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosecurity.org/?p=1779#comment-4984</guid>
		<description>Enforcement of the Red Flag Rule has been delayed by the FTC till November 1, 2009 per their July 29 press release. 
(http://www.ftc.gov/opa.209/07/redflag.shtm).

Doctors are NOT creditors under certain circumstances

 &quot;On the other hand, health care providers who require payment before or at the time of service are not creditors under the Red Flags Rule. In addition, if you accept only direct payment from Medicaid or similar programs where the patient has no responsibility for the fees, you are not a creditor. Simply accepting credit cards as a form of payment at the time of service does not make you a creditor under the Rule.&quot;  (http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/articles/art11.shtm)

The following is a direct quote from the FTC&#039;s FAQ on the RFR: (http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/microsites/redflagsrule/faqs.shtm#D)

# Does the Rule require that I have specific practices or procedures in my Program – like identifying a particular red flag or reporting suspected identity theft?

The Rule doesn’t require any specific practice or procedures.  It gives you the flexibility to tailor your Program to the nature of your business and the risks it faces.  The FTC will assess compliance based on the reasonableness of a company’s policies and procedures.  Businesses with a high risk for identity theft may need more robust procedures – like using other information sources to confirm the identity of new customers or incorporating fraud detection software.  Groups with a low risk for identity theft may have a more streamlined Program – for example, simply having a plan for how they’ll respond if they find out there has been an incident of identity theft involving their business... 

# Does the Red Flags Rule require me to check photo IDs of my customers?  If I check photo IDs, should I keep copies?

The Rule doesn’t specifically require you to check customers’ photo IDs.  Of course, for some businesses, checking photo IDs is one way to verify that customers are who they claim to be.  But if you decide to ask for a photo ID, keeping a copy often is unnecessary and can raise privacy and data security concerns, especially if you’re collecting other personal information like date of birth, address, or Social Security number.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enforcement of the Red Flag Rule has been delayed by the FTC till November 1, 2009 per their July 29 press release.<br />
(<a href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa.209/07/redflag.shtm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ftc.gov/opa.209/07/redflag.shtm</a>).</p>
<p>Doctors are NOT creditors under certain circumstances</p>
<p> &#8220;On the other hand, health care providers who require payment before or at the time of service are not creditors under the Red Flags Rule. In addition, if you accept only direct payment from Medicaid or similar programs where the patient has no responsibility for the fees, you are not a creditor. Simply accepting credit cards as a form of payment at the time of service does not make you a creditor under the Rule.&#8221;  (<a href="http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/articles/art11.shtm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/articles/art11.shtm</a>)</p>
<p>The following is a direct quote from the FTC&#8217;s FAQ on the RFR: (<a href="http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/microsites/redflagsrule/faqs.shtm#D" rel="nofollow">http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/microsites/redflagsrule/faqs.shtm#D</a>)</p>
<p># Does the Rule require that I have specific practices or procedures in my Program – like identifying a particular red flag or reporting suspected identity theft?</p>
<p>The Rule doesn’t require any specific practice or procedures.  It gives you the flexibility to tailor your Program to the nature of your business and the risks it faces.  The FTC will assess compliance based on the reasonableness of a company’s policies and procedures.  Businesses with a high risk for identity theft may need more robust procedures – like using other information sources to confirm the identity of new customers or incorporating fraud detection software.  Groups with a low risk for identity theft may have a more streamlined Program – for example, simply having a plan for how they’ll respond if they find out there has been an incident of identity theft involving their business&#8230; </p>
<p># Does the Red Flags Rule require me to check photo IDs of my customers?  If I check photo IDs, should I keep copies?</p>
<p>The Rule doesn’t specifically require you to check customers’ photo IDs.  Of course, for some businesses, checking photo IDs is one way to verify that customers are who they claim to be.  But if you decide to ask for a photo ID, keeping a copy often is unnecessary and can raise privacy and data security concerns, especially if you’re collecting other personal information like date of birth, address, or Social Security number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terrance</title>
		<link>http://philosecurity.org/2009/05/28/doctors-require-photo-id-for-treatment/comment-page-1#comment-4974</link>
		<dc:creator>terrance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosecurity.org/?p=1779#comment-4974</guid>
		<description>Hi,  I am employed by the government as an   Agent in one the Government Agencies (that I won&#039;t disclose here)  I was told by my supervisor  NOT to ALLOW ANYONE to copy my Drivers License or Federal Government Picture ID  for ANY purpose other then entrance into government building or National Airport. 

I do NOT allow Dr&#039;s offices to bully me  or intimidate me unless they can provide PROOF in writing that they need this information.   Then I will submit it to the Inspection office who will then contact them  regarding the need for such information. 

I go to Doctors offices, Dentist offices and hospitals regularly with the wife &amp; the kids. Not one employye has ever challenged me when I refuse to give them a copy of my ID for the purpose of copying it.  They may peruse it , they can take a picture of me when I am in their offices. They can photo copy my Insurance card . But thats where the line is drawn. I have NEVER been refused service or refused treatment by ANY office when I have adhered to this guideline.

If you want to guarantee your privacy and your safety; you had better learn when to draw the line also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,  I am employed by the government as an   Agent in one the Government Agencies (that I won&#8217;t disclose here)  I was told by my supervisor  NOT to ALLOW ANYONE to copy my Drivers License or Federal Government Picture ID  for ANY purpose other then entrance into government building or National Airport. </p>
<p>I do NOT allow Dr&#8217;s offices to bully me  or intimidate me unless they can provide PROOF in writing that they need this information.   Then I will submit it to the Inspection office who will then contact them  regarding the need for such information. </p>
<p>I go to Doctors offices, Dentist offices and hospitals regularly with the wife &amp; the kids. Not one employye has ever challenged me when I refuse to give them a copy of my ID for the purpose of copying it.  They may peruse it , they can take a picture of me when I am in their offices. They can photo copy my Insurance card . But thats where the line is drawn. I have NEVER been refused service or refused treatment by ANY office when I have adhered to this guideline.</p>
<p>If you want to guarantee your privacy and your safety; you had better learn when to draw the line also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Fiber</title>
		<link>http://philosecurity.org/2009/05/28/doctors-require-photo-id-for-treatment/comment-page-1#comment-4953</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Fiber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosecurity.org/?p=1779#comment-4953</guid>
		<description>Hi 

I just went to the Doctor yesterday with my Mother and we both we ask to show our driver&#039;s license and they did scan it and jokingly the receptionist stated &quot;just like going to the bar, you&#039;ll get ask for your ID and now we will know what favorite drinking places you go to and how much you drink&quot; - so be careful.  

I did not appreciate her sense of humor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi </p>
<p>I just went to the Doctor yesterday with my Mother and we both we ask to show our driver&#8217;s license and they did scan it and jokingly the receptionist stated &#8220;just like going to the bar, you&#8217;ll get ask for your ID and now we will know what favorite drinking places you go to and how much you drink&#8221; &#8211; so be careful.  </p>
<p>I did not appreciate her sense of humor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey</title>
		<link>http://philosecurity.org/2009/05/28/doctors-require-photo-id-for-treatment/comment-page-1#comment-4942</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosecurity.org/?p=1779#comment-4942</guid>
		<description>Hi guys,

I work in the medical field. We are not required to scan licenses into our computer systems. In fact there is no law that says we have to. But we do have to comply with the regulation, which means checking a photo ID at time of visit to make sure you are the patient, or taking your picuture so we always have it on file and can identify you in the future. If your docotor says it is the law for them to scan your drivers license, it is not. It may be their policy which they can do. I recomend if you find that this is their policy leaving that practice and finding another doctor who does not have this type of policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys,</p>
<p>I work in the medical field. We are not required to scan licenses into our computer systems. In fact there is no law that says we have to. But we do have to comply with the regulation, which means checking a photo ID at time of visit to make sure you are the patient, or taking your picuture so we always have it on file and can identify you in the future. If your docotor says it is the law for them to scan your drivers license, it is not. It may be their policy which they can do. I recomend if you find that this is their policy leaving that practice and finding another doctor who does not have this type of policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://philosecurity.org/2009/05/28/doctors-require-photo-id-for-treatment/comment-page-1#comment-4939</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 02:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosecurity.org/?p=1779#comment-4939</guid>
		<description>So if we go to the hopsital, can we refuse to give them a ID?

I have a friend who took her kid to the Dr and he scanned his hand and took a picture! OMG I almost died when she said she allowed them to do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if we go to the hopsital, can we refuse to give them a ID?</p>
<p>I have a friend who took her kid to the Dr and he scanned his hand and took a picture! OMG I almost died when she said she allowed them to do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie</title>
		<link>http://philosecurity.org/2009/05/28/doctors-require-photo-id-for-treatment/comment-page-1#comment-4928</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosecurity.org/?p=1779#comment-4928</guid>
		<description>The doctors offices are just as confused as most of these patients sound on your site.  We are getting conflicting information.  One government agency tells us we should make copies of driver&#039;s licenses or other photo ID and another agency tells us not to.  We are not sure what to do.  I can assure you that most doctor&#039;s office have anti virus and theft software on their computers so it would be difficult to hack a providers computer system but as we all know not impossible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The doctors offices are just as confused as most of these patients sound on your site.  We are getting conflicting information.  One government agency tells us we should make copies of driver&#8217;s licenses or other photo ID and another agency tells us not to.  We are not sure what to do.  I can assure you that most doctor&#8217;s office have anti virus and theft software on their computers so it would be difficult to hack a providers computer system but as we all know not impossible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg skomaroske</title>
		<link>http://philosecurity.org/2009/05/28/doctors-require-photo-id-for-treatment/comment-page-1#comment-4926</link>
		<dc:creator>greg skomaroske</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 03:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosecurity.org/?p=1779#comment-4926</guid>
		<description>i have been getting harassed at my pain medication doctors office and i believe that they are just asking for this from me to harass me even further. so, am i required by law to do this or not? can my doctor actually refuse to give me my pain meds because i will be refusing to give him my picture id? 
    our goverment and the medical providers have gone way over board in the last several years and i know this simply because of how i have been targeted and dropped at all of my doctors repeatedly until they now have me seeing this doctor possibly not even by my own choice as this doctor is the only one with in my area who will even take and perscribe pain meds for this condition of mine that i have been on pain meds for the last 4 years for. 
    is this something that all pain med patients have to worry about beyond the pressures of finding a doctor? what kind of terror watch list [with photo] will i be providing to these doctors that i trust no more than i trust our goverment?
    safty in number is what i say! everyone should just refuse to comply and they will be unable to impliment this stupid and evasive policy that is a violation of everyones rights to be free from excessive goverment intrussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have been getting harassed at my pain medication doctors office and i believe that they are just asking for this from me to harass me even further. so, am i required by law to do this or not? can my doctor actually refuse to give me my pain meds because i will be refusing to give him my picture id?<br />
    our goverment and the medical providers have gone way over board in the last several years and i know this simply because of how i have been targeted and dropped at all of my doctors repeatedly until they now have me seeing this doctor possibly not even by my own choice as this doctor is the only one with in my area who will even take and perscribe pain meds for this condition of mine that i have been on pain meds for the last 4 years for.<br />
    is this something that all pain med patients have to worry about beyond the pressures of finding a doctor? what kind of terror watch list [with photo] will i be providing to these doctors that i trust no more than i trust our goverment?<br />
    safty in number is what i say! everyone should just refuse to comply and they will be unable to impliment this stupid and evasive policy that is a violation of everyones rights to be free from excessive goverment intrussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sherri</title>
		<link>http://philosecurity.org/2009/05/28/doctors-require-photo-id-for-treatment/comment-page-1#comment-4890</link>
		<dc:creator>sherri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 03:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosecurity.org/?p=1779#comment-4890</guid>
		<description>Hi Karin,

Thanks for your input. The &quot;Red Flags&quot; Rule definitely does NOT require that IDs be copied or scanned at all. It is frequently implemented that way because it&#039;s an easy way to appear compliant (without actually solving the underlying problems). 

The Rule itself is actually fairly general. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/articles/art11.shtm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;According to the FTC&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;em&gt;If you’re covered by the Rule, your program must:
   1. Identify the kinds of red flags that are relevant to your practice;
   2. Explain your process for detecting them;
   3. Describe how you’ll respond to red flags to prevent and mitigate identity theft; and
   4. Spell out how you’ll keep your program current.&lt;/em&gt;

That&#039;s basically it.  The specifics are determined by your organization. 

There are certainly alternatives to checking ID. For example, patients are often asked to sign forms when they arrive at the doctor&#039;s office. Signature checking is an effective means of verifying a person&#039;s identity, which has worked for the banking industry for decades.  Rather than regularly asking for an updated copy of the patient&#039;s photo ID, office staff could simply check that the current signature matches the one already on file from previous visits. If not, that would be considered a red flag, and then staff could potentially ask for further verification (depending on the organization&#039;s response policy).

You might want to check out the AMA&#039;s formal objection to the Red Flag Rules &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ftc.gov/os/closings/staff/090204amaredflagsrule.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.

As described in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldprivacyforum.org/pdf/WPF_RedFlag_PressRelease_04242008fs.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;World Privacy Forum&#039;s 2008 report&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;Patient identity proofing, particularly in some implementations, can expose patients to increased risk of medical and other forms of identity theft...Depending on the implementation, it can potentially increase the liability of a health care provider.

&quot;When patients are, for example, asked for a drivers’ license when checking in to hospitals for surgery, the license itself may be copied or scanned and added into the actual patient file. This can give hospital insiders with criminal tendencies access to a treasure trove of photographic, biometric, and other information that may have been unavailable to them before. The result can be more identity theft (medical and otherwise).&quot; 

Hope that helps,

Sherri</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Karin,</p>
<p>Thanks for your input. The &#8220;Red Flags&#8221; Rule definitely does NOT require that IDs be copied or scanned at all. It is frequently implemented that way because it&#8217;s an easy way to appear compliant (without actually solving the underlying problems). </p>
<p>The Rule itself is actually fairly general. <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/articles/art11.shtm" rel="nofollow">According to the FTC</a>:</p>
<p><em>If you’re covered by the Rule, your program must:<br />
   1. Identify the kinds of red flags that are relevant to your practice;<br />
   2. Explain your process for detecting them;<br />
   3. Describe how you’ll respond to red flags to prevent and mitigate identity theft; and<br />
   4. Spell out how you’ll keep your program current.</em></p>
<p>That&#8217;s basically it.  The specifics are determined by your organization. </p>
<p>There are certainly alternatives to checking ID. For example, patients are often asked to sign forms when they arrive at the doctor&#8217;s office. Signature checking is an effective means of verifying a person&#8217;s identity, which has worked for the banking industry for decades.  Rather than regularly asking for an updated copy of the patient&#8217;s photo ID, office staff could simply check that the current signature matches the one already on file from previous visits. If not, that would be considered a red flag, and then staff could potentially ask for further verification (depending on the organization&#8217;s response policy).</p>
<p>You might want to check out the AMA&#8217;s formal objection to the Red Flag Rules <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/closings/staff/090204amaredflagsrule.pdf" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
<p>As described in <a href="http://www.worldprivacyforum.org/pdf/WPF_RedFlag_PressRelease_04242008fs.pdf" rel="nofollow">World Privacy Forum&#8217;s 2008 report</a>, &#8220;Patient identity proofing, particularly in some implementations, can expose patients to increased risk of medical and other forms of identity theft&#8230;Depending on the implementation, it can potentially increase the liability of a health care provider.</p>
<p>&#8220;When patients are, for example, asked for a drivers’ license when checking in to hospitals for surgery, the license itself may be copied or scanned and added into the actual patient file. This can give hospital insiders with criminal tendencies access to a treasure trove of photographic, biometric, and other information that may have been unavailable to them before. The result can be more identity theft (medical and otherwise).&#8221; </p>
<p>Hope that helps,</p>
<p>Sherri</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karin</title>
		<link>http://philosecurity.org/2009/05/28/doctors-require-photo-id-for-treatment/comment-page-1#comment-4889</link>
		<dc:creator>karin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 02:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosecurity.org/?p=1779#comment-4889</guid>
		<description>Hello! I work as a receptionist in a Doctor&#039;s office and am mortified by having to ask for ID.  So much so that I am considering a transfer to a different position, or look for a new job altogether.  What&#039;s worse is that while we used to get ID at the first visit only, now with this new law everyone is wigging out and wanting cards copied at each visit.  I am desperately trying to find documentation to bring to my boss that the rule does not specifically say that there has to be copy of Id card updated yearly in the chart. (which is how the manager has either interpreted it or chose to deal with it) Please help! And remember that the receptionist at the front counter is usually helpless and at the whim of zealous office managers. If you want to rant or complain please ask to speak to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello! I work as a receptionist in a Doctor&#8217;s office and am mortified by having to ask for ID.  So much so that I am considering a transfer to a different position, or look for a new job altogether.  What&#8217;s worse is that while we used to get ID at the first visit only, now with this new law everyone is wigging out and wanting cards copied at each visit.  I am desperately trying to find documentation to bring to my boss that the rule does not specifically say that there has to be copy of Id card updated yearly in the chart. (which is how the manager has either interpreted it or chose to deal with it) Please help! And remember that the receptionist at the front counter is usually helpless and at the whim of zealous office managers. If you want to rant or complain please ask to speak to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
