Comments on: Rogue Wireless Gets Sneakier http://philosecurity.org/2009/03/09/rogue-wireless-gets-sneakier Tue, 08 Nov 2011 22:48:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: easybutton http://philosecurity.org/2009/03/09/rogue-wireless-gets-sneakier/comment-page-1#comment-4624 easybutton Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:38:39 +0000 http://philosecurity.org/?p=1113#comment-4624 Using Channel 14 isn't that hidden. I know that the Intel Centrino Platform definately supports Channel 14 because my old IBM Thinkpad let me access it. Using Channel 14 isn’t that hidden. I know that the Intel Centrino Platform definately supports Channel 14 because my old IBM Thinkpad let me access it.

]]> By: LonerVamp http://philosecurity.org/2009/03/09/rogue-wireless-gets-sneakier/comment-page-1#comment-4493 LonerVamp Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:21:20 +0000 http://philosecurity.org/?p=1113#comment-4493 Nice tips! I didn't know about wknock, but that certainly is an excellent idea and makes me want to dig up a box to put openwrt on again. Nice tips! I didn’t know about wknock, but that certainly is an excellent idea and makes me want to dig up a box to put openwrt on again.

]]> By: Hakan http://philosecurity.org/2009/03/09/rogue-wireless-gets-sneakier/comment-page-1#comment-4484 Hakan Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:27:34 +0000 http://philosecurity.org/?p=1113#comment-4484 @sir jorge Disgruntled employees can even go to the server room and pour a big bucket of water on the servers. That is a reason, why Servers should also be protected physically. @sir jorge

Disgruntled employees can even go to the server room and pour a big bucket of water on the servers. That is a reason, why Servers should also be protected physically.

]]> By: sir jorge http://philosecurity.org/2009/03/09/rogue-wireless-gets-sneakier/comment-page-1#comment-4482 sir jorge Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:36:56 +0000 http://philosecurity.org/?p=1113#comment-4482 Wow, this is rad, I never knew disgruntled employees could or would do this sort of thing. Wow, this is rad, I never knew disgruntled employees could or would do this sort of thing.

]]> By: Hakan http://philosecurity.org/2009/03/09/rogue-wireless-gets-sneakier/comment-page-1#comment-4481 Hakan Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:32:51 +0000 http://philosecurity.org/?p=1113#comment-4481 All these things do not help, if the company is using Cisco switches with security options enabled. The switch will detect the traffic and shut down the port where the AP is connected to. All these things do not help, if the company is using Cisco switches with security options enabled. The switch will detect the traffic and shut down the port where the AP is connected to.

]]> By: JP http://philosecurity.org/2009/03/09/rogue-wireless-gets-sneakier/comment-page-1#comment-4466 JP Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:06:53 +0000 http://philosecurity.org/?p=1113#comment-4466 Nice to see that WAP are getting smarter, all that points to have your inside network secured. Nothing really new from a usual tap perspective. Nice to see that WAP are getting smarter, all that points to have your inside network secured.
Nothing really new from a usual tap perspective.

]]>